FNDS 1306: Crossing Boundaries - Passing

"Understanding Primary & Secondary Sources" by Imagine Easy Solutions

"Primary sources are materials produced by people or groups directly involved in the event or topic under consideration, either as participants or as witnesses," (A Pocket Guide to Writing History, 5th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2007).

These primary sources are what historians, art and literary critics, researchers, etc. rely on to interpret history, movements, and events. Primary sources differ based on subject. For history they are first hand accounts of an event, topic, or time period. These sources can be diary entries, laws, ephemeral such as fliers, newspaper articles, photographs, speeches, etc. For art, primary sources are any original artistic piece. Such as paintings, sculptures, music, plays, poetry, and any other original form of artistic creation. For FNDS 1306 you may need to draw on primary sources not only from history, but also art and literature to get a contextual understanding for the time period in which the person who is "passing" lived. Other examples of primary sources of people detailing their experiences passing in modern day could be YouTube clips or blog posts.

For information on how to find primary sources, check out the Recommended Databases page on the left hand side.

Secondary sources are written about primary sources or past events. Secondary sources can be reviews of art, textbooks, encyclopedias, analysis or criticism of other works or events, and newspapers or news media.

For information on how to find secondary sources, check out the Recommended Databases page on the left hand side.

1. Read the document carefully.

2. Think about the following questions. Some of these questions apply better to some documents than others. Some questions you may not be able to answer because of incomplete information (an obstacle historians regularly face), but you may be able to speculate based on your historical knowledge. Choose the questions (it could be several) that you think can best be used to analyze and reveal the meanings of your document. In your notes compose brief responses to these questions.

• WHAT is this document? (letter, photo, diary, official speech, etc)
  • What historical event or phenomenon might it help me address?
• WHO wrote this document?
  • From this document, what can we tell about the perspective of the author(s)?
  • Does the document suggest that the author(s)’ point of view was widely shared, or was it controversial and confined to a few people?
• WHEN was this document created?
  • How does the document reflect the time when it was written or created?
  • What does it say about the events underway at the time?
  • What does it suggest about how that particular time was perceived by the author(s)?
• WHY was this document created? What was its purpose?
• WHO was the intended AUDIENCE?
  • How did the audience shape what the author(s) says?
  • How would the intended audience be likely to read the document?
  • How would people who were not among the intended audience be likely to read it?
• Think carefully about the choice of WORDS in the document.
  • How do the words in the document reflect the author(s), the time, and the intended audience?
  • Does the author(s) choice of words reveal covert assumptions along with an overt message?
• Comparison to other sources: How are the tone, perspective, and purpose of this document similar or different than others I have read on this topic?
• After reading it, what do I still wish I knew?

3. Now step back and make a more overall assessment that includes the basics of the document (including its style/tone), its strengths and weaknesses, the historical questions it might speak to, and some conclusions about the significance of the document?

Be a detective; consider this document a “clue.” Read between the lines. This is not meant to be a summary of the document. Try to say something meaningful about the document’s significance – how it adds to our understanding of this particular episode of American History.

Avoid presentism. You should not focus on making comparisons/contrasts to the present day. Your job is not to decide whether a document is good or bad, or whether the author was right or wrong; rather, you should be seeking to understand the document’s form, function, and impact.